treatment receiving the phytobiotic, including 5.8% larger average shrimp
size at harvest and 12% better feed conversion compared to the control
group. The addition of the phytobiotic reduced drastically the variability
of production results among ponds fed the same feed (average coefficient
of variation between ponds for the 6 production parameters: control 18%
versus SANACORE group 10%; Table 7).
Photo 5 Feeding
manually from a boat
and harvesting shrimp
at the CAMACO
farm, Panama (with
courtesy of Jorge
Cuéllar-Anjel)
Table 7: Production results after processing for control ponds and treatment ponds receiving
phytobiotic supplement after 141 days of culture
Treatment
Survival
(%)
Shrimp size
(g)
Crop Yield
(kg/ha)
Feed (kg/
pond 3 ha)
FCR
Weekly
Growth
(g/wk)
Average
coefficient of
variation for
parameters
listed (CV%)
Sanacore® GM 55.5 ± 7.1 a 16.6 ± 1.5 a 735 ± 78 a 4,170 ± 338 a 1.91 ± 0.23 a 0.825 ± 0.075 a 10%
Control
44.6 ± 10.6 b 15.7 ± 2.9 a 543 ± 90 b 3,464 ± 396 b 2.17 ± 0.39 a 0.776 ± 0.137 a
18%
% change
Sanacore vs
control
+ 24.4% +5.8% +35.2% +20.4% -12.1% +6.3% -41%
P Value
0.034
0.4395
0.0004
0.0018
0.7130
0.3876
——
Average and standard deviation of 8 replicate ponds of 3ha per treatment; Vaca et al., 2010.
42
Innovative approaches to reduce feed cost in aquaculture: optimizing nutrient utilization and gut health